Summary
A comprehensive review challenges alternative proposals, reinforcing the traditional 2–3 BC date for Jesus’ birth. By scrutinizing historical records—such as Augustus’s census decree, Quirinius’s governorship, and Herod’s death—the study debunks claims suggesting earlier or later dates (e.g., 6–7 BC or AD 6–7). The research also interprets the Star of Bethlehem as a series of celestial events, including Jupiter-Venus conjunctions, aligning with astrological knowledge of the Magi. This conclusion supports the scientific credibility of the Gospels’ accounts by validating their historical and astronomical consistency.
Citation
Dickin, A. (2026). Evidence for 2–3 BC as the Date of the Nativity and the Star of Bethlehem. Christian Perspectives on Science and Technology, 5, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.58913/kzup1334