Análise e Reflexões em Torno da Dislexia no Contexto Educacional Atual

A comparative analysis of discursive fields surrounding terrorism reveals that the concept lacks universal consensus, with four dominant historical trajectories shaping its interpretation: anarchist (1880–1920), anticolonialist (1920–1960), new left (1960–1990), and religious (post-1979). The study employs Foucault's archeology and genealogy to dissect how power and knowledge intersect in terroristic discourses, demonstrating that truth is historically contingent and shaped by hegemonic forces. Using the 2008 Mumbai attacks—including the bombing at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus—as a case study, the research highlights the fluidity of definitions and the role of retoric in legitimizing actions, emphasizing the need for nuanced, context-specific frameworks to understand terrorism's evolving nature.

ARAÚJO, C. B. V. D., & SOUZA, L. D. (2021). ANÁLISE E REFLEXÕES EM TORNO DA DISLEXIA NO CONTEXTO EDUCACIONAL ATUAL. Pesquisas Científicas: Da Teoria À Prática. https://doi.org/10.37423/211205178